Why NWO is Bad for Atheists

So I am not sure if Alex Jones is a fraud, or merely a profiteer using Fear Mongering to sell survival items, it seems to me to still be clear that if the New World Order has any of the objectives Alex Jones or a host of other commentators have said it has, then it is definitely not good news for Atheists, or anyone else for that matter. More to the point, One World Government, One World Religion and One World Corporation sound down right anathema to what the average Atheist would consider a good deal.

First though I would like to get rid of one myth, the myth is that Atheists are all communists or socialists. I could dispose of this idea by merely imploring anyone who reads this to believe me that I personally am not a communist or socialist, but if that is not enough, then the public record of Ayn Rand's economic views should suffice on the matter. The reality is of course that atheism just means no belief in any form of theism, this by itself does not preclude any other ideas such as anarchism, neo-conservatism or many other ism's. That said, there is no reason to assume that atheists do not have any other spread of political ideas as any other group, there being Republican, Democrat and Independent Atheists. The original socialists were Christian as an aside.

With that out of the way, why would Atheists be so against the New World Order? The first reason is that the New World Order most likely has the Vatican at the tip. Even if the Vatican is not at the apex of the NWO, having one world wide religion (which ever religion that might be) should be more then enough to make any atheist cringe. This religion whatever it would be would through its unity provide a dangerous environment for atheists.

It also seems that if there is a NWO, one of its prominent features in connection with the One World Religion is that the resulting religion would be some amalgam of Occult nonsense that has accumulated throughout the ages. The evidence for this conjecture can be found in the gatherings of high-placed individuals in all sectors of society. This is the exact opposite of what is desired by those who are atheist.

Next up is World Government. World government sounds like a good idea until one thinks about how dangerous such a concentration of power could be. Atheists look at science as an example of how to resolve disputes. Science is a decentralized and highly critical activity that requires honesty and perseverance of the highest caliber. Centralized Governments have a way of stifling free inquiry. The type of government an atheist would like is one that is efficient and distributed, based on an organic growth of relationships.

Finally, looking at the historical record, the path from the Vatican to Protestantism to Atheism is clearly one that moves from Superstitious Collectivism to Scientific Individual Freedom.